A Wisconsin judge accused of aiding a Mexican immigrant in evading federal authorities was found guilty of obstruction by a jury on Thursday. This verdict is seen as a win for President Donald Trump in his nationwide immigration enforcement efforts. The judge, Hannah Dugan, faced charges of obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest in April. While she was acquitted on the concealment charge, she could still face up to five years in prison for obstruction.
Following six hours of deliberation, the jury reached their verdict. The sentencing date is yet to be determined. The case has stirred controversy over Trump’s immigration policies, with his administration labeling Dugan as an activist judge, while Democrats argue that the administration is targeting her to deter judicial opposition.
After the verdict, Dugan and her legal team refrained from speaking to reporters, expressing disappointment with the ruling. Dugan, who was suspended from her position amid the scandal, did not testify during the trial. U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel dismissed claims that the case was politically motivated and urged for a peaceful acceptance of the verdict.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche commended the verdict, emphasizing that no one, not even judges, is above the law. This outcome serves as a success for the Trump administration, which has faced challenges in prosecuting individuals critical of Trump, such as James Comey and Letitia James.
The incident involving Dugan aiding Eduardo Flores-Ruiz in evading immigration authorities took place at the Milwaukee County courthouse. Dugan informed agents that their warrant for Flores-Ruiz was insufficient, directing them to the chief judge’s office. Subsequently, Flores-Ruiz was arrested by agents after a foot chase, and he was later deported by the Department of Homeland Security.
During the trial, prosecutors argued that Dugan’s actions were intended to enable Flores-Ruiz’s escape. Audio recordings from the courtroom were presented, where Dugan mentioned taking responsibility for leading Flores-Ruiz out. Testimonies from colleagues criticized Dugan’s conduct, emphasizing that judges should not assist in evading arrests.
Dugan’s defense contended that she was following courthouse protocols and had no intent to obstruct the arrest team. The defense presented its case briefly, with witnesses including Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, who praised Dugan’s honesty.
